Pre-season #5, York College of Pennsylvania (YCP) thumped Gettysburg 5-1 in a NCAA Division III match-up in York, PA.
EDITOR: HUH? Why are you covering Div III? Have you lost your mind?
ANSWER: There’s a senior at York that has drawn my attention. He lit up the PDL this past year to a tune of 14 goals with 5 assists in 16 games earning All-League honors and league MVP runner-up. Last year, he was a first team NSCAA Division III All-American. He was a
NJCAA All-regional in 2004. The same year that Michael Randolph was a JUCO MVP. The player that I was interested in watching is Andrew Wheeler. I wanted to see if he’s ready to be a professional. Short answer, nope – not yet.
My understanding is that he was ineligible to play Division I/II because his grades were insufficient. It’s too bad, because he hasn’t had that day-to-day competition pushing him to get better and work harder. In a competitive environment, he skills and determination could be finer honed.
After watching some of the 4 best college teams (UCLA, IU, ND, MD) in the nation over the week-end, it was a let-down to watch an uninspired first half by both teams. York did much better in the second half, combining with each other to attack more quicker and unbalance Gettysburg.
Wheeler got an early goal by stealing a back pass faking the keeper and finishing the opportunity within 2 minutes of the start of the game. Then a minute later, he settled the ball and passed the ball to an open Justin Suchoski that went just wide. Wow. I was gearing up to see an exhibit of skill. It didn’t materialize.
After scoring, Wheeler wasn’t too effective. A head flick here, a flick on, a couple of step-overs. But he was generally too static. He has good dribbling skills and is a tall target (6′3″). Kind of reminds me of Jacqua (at least for being tall). Wheeler seems to like to get wide to give himself more time for his first touch and to isolate the outside defender in a 1v1 situation.
Wheeler has a hard shot but today it was erratic killing many low flying birds in the area.
His work rate was woefully inadequate. I wonder if he’s lazy because he doesn’t need to run hard to receive the ball or is it that he isn’t challenged. Perhaps, this is his personality. At times, he tries to be too clever (e.g., unnecessary back heels) that might give credence to his being bored.
The second half was much better. Wheeler took a very wide position. On one play, he headed the ball over his defender getting behind the Gettysburg defense, and centered the ball to an open Jason Mancuso who let the ball run to give himself more space and finished. On the play, Wheeler didn’t assertively put himself in a better position (rebound, pass back), instead, he did that “fake half run” (if you have ever coached kids, you know this one – half run looking like the player is working, but going nowhere).
I observed other runs/thoughts that make me wonder about his tactical complexity. Does he make the proper run? With the run, does he attack at various change of pace? Is he thinking ahead, where is the ball going, where should he be? What could unbalance the defense? I don’t think so. He’s very competent running onto a through ball or taking on a defender 1v1. I have seen him shoot with power from speed.
Luckily, I will see Wheeler two more times this year to either confirm my initial observations/suspicions or refute them. Right now, I don’t think he’s a MLS quality draft candidate.
He will be a Sophomore in 2007. As a freshmen, he scored 1 goal and had 3 assists. Gonzalez can play central defense and forward. Because of the lack of size of the Maryland back line, he was a key component in solidifying a transitioning defense. In 2005, Maryland graduated 3 defenders (Lancos, Bertz and Glaudemans though he wound up coming back as a grad student). Gonzalez is equally adept as a forward. Sasho Cirovski, Maryland coach, would typically move him up to forward if Maryland was behind late in games – and risk giving up a goal by compromising his defense.
acclaimed when he entered UVA in the fall of 2006 after trialing with Ajax. Some people have claimed that 2006 was a disappointment – I would dispute those claims. He had 3 goals and 5 assists as a freshmen which aren’t exceptional stats. In this case, the numbers don’t tell the whole story. He earned membership onto the 2006 Soccer America All-Freshmen team.
season Soccer America All-American and on the full and post Hermann watch list. Reyering will be a junior in the fall. However, he’s lost a year of eligibility because of his Osnabrueck’s first team appearances. UVA successfully appealed to the NCAA to apply the loss of eligibility to be applied in his senior year rather than his freshmen year. Therefore, we should expect that Reyering will be going professional at the end of this season. I was surprised that he didn’t come out after this past season. His birthday is July 10, 1984. Therefore, he’ll only have 1 year of YI classification if he enters MLS in 2008.
national accolades in 2006. I believe that he fell out of public view because he lost all of the 2005 season (except for 2 games) to injury. In 2006, he scored 6 goals and added 11 assists.
nd team All-American and a Soccer America pre-season All-American. In 2006, he scored 16 goals and added 8 assists. As a freshmen in 2005, he tallied 8 goals and 6 assists.
freshmen team. In 2006, he scored 1 goal and added 7 assists.
n King, an attacking midfielder for the University of Maryland, was a 2005 Soccer Times honorable mention All-American. He was a key member of the 2005 National Champions. King will be a senior in the fall. 2006 was a substandard year for King. I would classify the year as a disappointment. King scored 6 goals with 7 assists in 2006. The prior year (2005), he scored 15 goals with 8 assists. In his freshmen year, he scored 7 goals and tallied 5 assists. So, his productivity was equivalent to his freshmen productivity. He’s going to have to do better.